Editorial: Nigeria—A Nation Once Sold as a Cheap Commodity To Royal Niger Company Owned By The British

The history of Nigeria’s colonization by the Royal Niger Company serves as a chilling reminder of the exploitative legacy of imperialism, where a land rich in culture and resources was treated as mere merchandise to be bought, sold, and looted. The very foundation of modern Nigeria bears the scars of a system that prioritized profit over people, using deceit and force to claim dominion over its lands and resources.

In the late 19th century, the Royal Niger Company operated not as a mere trading entity but as a de facto colonial government. Empowered by a royal charter, the company was granted control over vast territories surrounding the Niger and Benue rivers. This commercial monopoly was not only a tool for economic exploitation but also a weapon of subjugation. With treaties signed under duress or deceit, local chiefs unknowingly ceded their sovereignty and the lifeblood of their economies—resources such as palm oil, cocoa, and cotton—to the company.

At the heart of this exploitation was the palm oil trade. By the mid-19th century, palm oil had replaced slaves as the primary export of the Niger Delta, driven by Britain’s industrial demand for lubricants. Local economies, previously thriving on equitable trade, were systematically dismantled. Chiefs like Jaja of Opobo, who sought to maintain control over their trade, were exiled or eliminated. The tragic story of Jaja, poisoned en route back from exile, exemplifies the ruthless lengths to which the company and the British government went to suppress resistance.

The conflict with King Koko of Nembe underscores the devastating impact of British imperialism. When King Koko led a bold raid against the Royal Niger Company’s headquarters in Akassa in 1895, it was not just an act of defiance but a desperate attempt to reclaim control over trade and his people’s future. The brutal British retaliation—burning Brass to the ground, killing thousands, and further impoverishing the Nembe people—exemplifies the inhumane response to any challenge against the imperial order.

The Royal Niger Company’s reign was marked by systemic plunder. Resources were extracted for British industries, while local communities were left impoverished. The eventual revocation of the company’s charter in 1899 did little to alleviate the suffering. The British government paid £865,000—a sum equivalent to £46 million today—to acquire the company’s holdings, a payment not to the people of Nigeria but to a corporate entity that had already profited immensely from the land.

The consequences of this transaction were profound. By treating Nigeria as a purchased territory, the British government solidified its approach to governance: one that prioritized economic exploitation over human development. The pacification of the Lower Niger, exemplified by the ousting of resistant rulers like King Koko and the Oba of Benin, laid the groundwork for the systematic looting of Nigeria’s wealth throughout the colonial period.

Even today, the legacy of this exploitation lingers. The economic structures imposed by the Royal Niger Company and the British colonial administration prioritized resource extraction over sustainable development, a model that persists in various forms. The wealth generated from Nigeria’s abundant natural resources continues to flow outward, often benefiting foreign entities more than the Nigerian people.

As Nigerians reflect on their history, the story of the Royal Niger Company is a stark reminder of the resilience of their forebears and the need to reclaim their narrative. The era of being treated as a commodity may be over, but the struggle for true economic independence and equitable development remains ongoing. Only by confronting and learning from this painful history can Nigeria chart a future free from the shadows of exploitation.

This history must serve as a call to action: for leaders to safeguard the nation’s wealth, for citizens to demand accountability, and for the global community to acknowledge and redress the injustices of the past.

Written by Emmanuel Odekina Iyede Aidoko Onuche

Related posts

Tinubu Directs Security Forces to Eliminate Kidnappers and Separatists by 2025

Osun Boy Sentenced to Death Reveals Truth Behind Fowl Theft Conviction

Editorial: A Nation in Mourning: The Tragic Failures of Tinubu’s Food Security Measures

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More