The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) has strongly criticized the recent directive to shut down all schools—both public and private—throughout the Ramadan fast in Bauchi, Katsina, Kano, and Kebbi states.
Despite claims of stakeholder consultation, CAN insists that its leadership was not engaged, raising concerns over equity, educational disruption, and religious inclusivity.
CAN’s Concerns Over Prolonged School Closures
CAN President, Archbishop Daniel Okoh, issued a statement on Sunday stressing that policies affecting Muslims, Christians, and other groups require transparent, inclusive dialogue with parents, educators, religious leaders, and school proprietors.
The association noted that these northern states are already battling alarming out-of-school rates, averaging 44%, significantly exceeding the national average.
“Even in countries where Islam is deeply ingrained—like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates—schools are not shut down for the entire Ramadan period,” the statement emphasized.
“Instead, they adjust schedules, reducing school hours or offering flexibility to balance education with religious observance. A month-long closure, or five weeks in Bauchi’s case, is excessive and unnecessary,” CAN stated.
Potential Violation of Constitutional Rights
CAN warned that these directives could violate the rights of students and families who do not observe Ramadan, setting a dangerous precedent for equitable governance.
The Christian body called on Governors Bala Mohammed (Bauchi), Dikko Umar Radda (Katsina), Abba Kabir Yusuf (Kano), and Nasir Idris (Kebbi) to immediately engage religious bodies, school owners, parents, and civil society to review the policy.
“If dialogue fails to bring justice, CAN is prepared to seek legal redress and restraining orders from the courts to protect constitutional rights to education and freedom of conscience,” Archbishop Okoh warned.
While urging calm among residents, CAN reaffirmed its commitment to justice and religious fairness, insisting that peace must not come at the expense of fundamental rights.