MOSOP Questions NNPC-Sahara Deal, Calls for Presidential Intervention | The Bureau Newspaper
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home » Latest Nigerian News » MOSOP Questions NNPC-Sahara Deal, Calls for Presidential Intervention

MOSOP Questions NNPC-Sahara Deal, Calls for Presidential Intervention

by
2 minutes read

The Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP) has voiced concerns over a Financial and Technical Services Agreement (FTSA) involving Sahara Energy and West African Gas Limited (WAGL), an affiliate of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC). MOSOP argues that the agreement lacked transparency, was not in Nigeria’s best interest, and violated ethical standards.

Allegations of Fraud and Deception

MOSOP President Fegalo Nsuke, speaking in Abuja over the weekend, described the deal as fraudulent and a betrayal of national integrity. Nsuke criticized the arrangement, labelling it as “shameful” and indicative of corruption in public service.

“WAGL is an affiliate of Sahara and the NNPC. How then can Sahara go into an agreement with its own affiliate? This is deceptive and fraudulent,” Nsuke asserted.

Call for Presidential Action

Nsuke urged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to cancel the FTSA, citing irregularities and lack of inclusivity in the deal. He called for a new arrangement that prioritizes fairness and justice for the Ogoni people, especially concerning revenue distribution from natural resources on Ogoni land.

“The Ogoni Congress has outlined a clear path to resolving the decades-old conflict. Exploring this path will bring peace and development to Ogoni and Nigeria,” Nsuke emphasized.

MOSOP’s Stance Against Sahara Energy

MOSOP has consistently opposed Sahara Energy’s involvement in OML 11 operations, claiming the company’s presence is unacceptable to the Ogoni people. Nsuke accused both Sahara Energy and the NNPC of undermining MOSOP’s efforts to achieve a lasting resolution to the Ogoni crisis.

He further demanded that Sahara Energy relinquish its claims over the Ogoni region to pave the way for constructive dialogue and equitable engagement.

Historical Context

The dispute over OML 11 has its roots in longstanding grievances by the Ogoni people, who, through MOSOP, have fought for justice in the management of their resources. MOSOP asserts that the sacrifices made by Ogoni leaders to oust Shell from the region must be respected in any decisions regarding oil production resumption.

The Way Forward

Nsuke called for a presidential intervention to ensure fair treatment of the Ogoni people, reiterating that an inclusive approach is essential for sustainable peace and development in the area.

This development underscores the need for transparency and fairness in resource management, especially in regions with a history of exploitation and conflict.

You may also like

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Verified by MonsterInsights